2015 Abstracts and Presenters

Particle and Wav

Light and matter behave in a way that is characteristic of waves and also in a way that is characteristic of particles. The particle aspect involves effects that appear at precise locations, and the wave aspects are interference effects. We will discuss these behaviors and some experiments that show both at the same time.

Tim Maudlin, New York University

Tim Maudlin received a BA degree in Physics and Philosophy from Yale University and a Ph.D. in History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Pittsburgh. He taught philosophy at Rutgers University for 25 years, and moved to New York University in 2011. He studies the nature of space and time, as well as quantum theory. He is particularly interested in how quantum theory differs from earlier physical theories. His most recent work develops a new mathematical way to describe space and time.


A Quantum Mechanical Experiment

I will describe experiments involving electrons (simplified versions of the famous two slit experiment) that illustrate the uncertainty principle and whose results seem to undermine ordinary logic. The experiments also seem to show that observing an electron in some way changes its behavior even without an ordinary physical interaction. It is this feature of quantum mechanics phenomena that has led to some to think that there is a special role for observation and consciousness in quantum mechanics. Then I briefly describe how QM describes these experiments in terms of wave functions and superpositions.

Barry Loewer, Rutgers University

Barry Loewer received his BA from Amherst College in Philosophy and Mathematics and his PhD from Stanford University in Philosophy. I currently teach philosophy at Rutgers University. My main academic interests are in the metaphysics of physics, the philosophy of cosmology and the philosophy of mind. I am especially interested in understanding what laws are and in what grounds the direction of time and the relationship between these two questions. I am currently editing a collection of papers on issues in philosophy of cosmology. I have some acquaintance with Buddhist practice and is eager to understand more.


Foundations of Buddhist Emptiness

One of the most important philosophical insights in Buddhism is the theory of emptiness. Understanding this view is not just for the sake of intellectual exercise but it is for the ultimate solution for all the ills that we experience in this world. This is so because there is a fundamental disparity between the way we perceive the world and the way things actually exist. In our day-to -day experience, we tend to relate to the world and to ourselves as having intrinsic, independent existence. This is not only a fundamental error but also the basis for attachment, clinging, and the development of our numerous prejudices. This fundamental truth of “the way things really are” is described in the Buddhist writings as “emptiness,” or shunyata in Sanskrit. The understanding of emptiness is really calling for a radical reorientation away from our habitual preoccupation with self. It is a call to turn toward the wider community of beings with whom we are connected, and for conduct which recognizes other’s interest alongside our own. The physicist David Bohm during one of the meetings with His Holiness the Dalai Lama says “If we examine the various ideologies that tend to divide humanity, such as racism, extreme nationalism and the Marxist class struggle, one of the key factors of the origin is the tendency to perceive things as inherently divided and disconnected. From this misconception springs the belief that each of these divisions is essentially independent and self-existent.” It is an observable reality that things are interdependent and interconnected. Therefore the understanding of emptiness or interdependence is really the bedrock for harmony, morality and long-lasting happiness.

Geshe Lhakdor, Library of Tibetan Works & Archives

Geshe Lhakdor is the director of the Library of Tibetan Works and Archives in Dharamsala, India. A distinguished Buddhist scholar, he was the English translator for His Holiness, the 14th Dalai Lama, from 1989 to 2005. He has co-translated and co-produced several books by the Dalai Lama. From 1976 to 1986, Lhakdor studied specialized Buddhist philosophy in the Institute of Buddhist Dialectics, Dharamsala and received the Master of Prajnaparamita in 1982. He also received the Master of Madhyamika in 1989 and the Master of Philosophy from the University of Delhi. Since 2002, Geshe Lhakdor has been an Honorary Professor at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. In 2008, he was also conferred an Honorary Professorship by the University of Delhi, Department of Psychology.


Cosmology and the Void

The concept and physical nature of emptiness is central to modern cosmology. The observable universe is 13.8 billion years old, 92 billion light years in size, and the space between the 100 billion galaxies is an almost perfect vacuum. The physical universe is probably much larger than the observable universe. The dominant component of the universe is a manifestation of the vacuum called dark energy, which is causing space-time to expand at an accelerating rate. If the universe experienced an early episode of exponential expansion called inflation, then the seeds for galaxies were quantum scale and the entire universe could have arisen from a quantum fluctuation. The frontier of cosmology involves understanding the physical nature of the vacuum and reconciling gravity and quantum physics.

Chris Impey, University of Arizona, Tucson

Chris Impey is a University Distinguished Professor and Deputy Head of the Department of Astronomy at the University of Arizona. He has over 170 refereed publications on the topics of observational cosmology, galaxies, gravitational lensing, and quasars. He has taught two online classes with over 60,000 enrolled. He’s written 40 popular articles on cosmology and astrobiology, two introductory textbooks, and seven popular books: The Living Cosmos, How It Ends, Talking About Life, How It Began, Dreams of Other Worlds, Humble Before the Void, and Beyond. He has been teaching in the Science for Monks program since 2008.


Buddhist Philosophy of Particles

In Buddhism the concept of part-less particles is described with noted differences between the four major philosophical schools of Buddhism. My presentation will describe the different schools and how we understand particles from a philosophical perspective. These schools describe both a quantized and continuum understanding of the nature matter, space, and time. My position is that both philosophical positions are possible and provide a valid interpretation of reality. In Buddhism, and common across all the philosophical schools, there is always a causal relationship, no effect can occur without a cause.

Thabkhe, Sera Jey Monastery

Thabkhe was born in central Tibet in 1979 and become a monk at the age of ten. In 1997 he came into exile, in India, and joined Sera Jey Monastery. In 2004 he started attending science classes organized by the Science Meets Dharma program and in 2007 joined workshops organized by the Science for Monks program. In 2010, Thabkhe was among the first batch of monastic science leaders to complete the Sager Science Leadership. In 2008 Thabkhe joined the Emory Tibet Science Initiative and was among the first batch of monks to study at Emory University. After returning from three years of study at Emory, in 2014, Thabkhe started teaching regular physics classes at his monastery.


Distant Connections in Quantum Theory

In classical physics, causes and effects are always connected in space and time. Something that happens in one place can only influence what happens somewhere else through a connected series of effects. According to the Theory of Relativity, such effects cannot travel faster than light. I will present an experiment from quantum theory that cannot be explained using classical physics. It shows that even very distant events must be connected physically, in a way that even effects that move as fast as light could not explain.

Tim Maudlin, New York University

Tim Maudlin received a BA degree in Physics and Philosophy from Yale University and a Ph.D. in History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Pittsburgh. He taught philosophy at Rutgers University for 25 years, and moved to New York University in 2011. He studies the nature of space and time, as well as quantum theory. He is particularly interested in how quantum theory differs from earlier physical theories. His most recent work develops a new mathematical way to describe space and time.


The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics

On the standard text-book account of quantum mechanics the quantum state evolves so that macroscopic objects can end up in quantum states that are superpositions of macroscopic properties. For example, a cat may evolve so that it is in a superposition of being alive and being dead. This is the famous Schrödinger cat paradox. The orthodox account of quantum mechanics responds to it by proposing that the quantum state evolves in a special way when observations are made. So when the cat is observed the ordinary evolution is replaced by one in which the quantum state jumps to one corresponding to the cat’s being alive or to one corresponding to its being dead. This makes observation play a fundamental role in physics. I point out problems with this idea and briefly sketch some alternative versions of quantum mechanics in which observation does not play this role.

Barry Loewer, Rutgers University

Barry Loewer received his BA from Amherst College in Philosophy and Mathematics and his PhD from Stanford University in Philosophy. I currently teach philosophy at Rutgers University. My main academic interests are in the metaphysics of physics, the philosophy of cosmology and the philosophy of mind. I am especially interested in understanding what laws are and in what grounds the direction of time and the relationship between these two questions. I am currently editing a collection of papers on issues in philosophy of cosmology. I have some acquaintance with Buddhist practice and is eager to understand more.


Bohmian Mechanics applied to Consciousness

The orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics developed by Niels Bohr and his associates were unacceptable to many founders of quantum mechanics. The wave-particle duality as complimentarity, the probability interpretation, indeterminism, and the collapse of the wave function were shown as problematic by the quantum mechanics critics. Meanwhile a mathematical formalism was developed by the supporters of quantum mechanics to deny any other interpretation of quantum mechanics claiming that there is only one interpretation and it is the orthodox interpretation supported by them. Bohm proposed a new interpretation with a deterministic philosophical position. He proposed that the particle is followed by a quantum potential or wave and he developed a mathematical structure. This particle-quantum potential proposal can be applied to mind-matter problem where the mind leads the body. There are some experimental evidences already discovered for this interpretation though all the scientific community could not agree on this quantum mechanics interpretation and its application to the mind-body problem.

Father Mathew Chandrankunnel, Dharmaram College

Father Mathew Chandrankunnel teaches at Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram (DVK), Philosophy of Science, Science and Religion and as well at Christ University, Bangalore. He has been a visiting professor at Cochin University of Science and Technology, University of Leuven, Belgium, University of Vladimir, Russia, and the Vietnamese Institute for Indian and South Asian Studies, Hanoi, Vietnam. Father Mathew received his doctorate from the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Leuven, Belgium for successfully defending the thesis “In Search of a Causal Quantum Mechanics”, comparing two interpretations in Quantum Mechanics. He did his postdoctoral research studies at Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Boston while staying at the Holy Cross Cathedral, Boston.


Mind and Conscious Experience

Some philosophers think that everything, including our mind and conscious experience is fully constituted by physical processes. I will discuss a case involving a very knowledgeable neuro-scientist who studies color vision but has never seen colors herself. This case has been used to argue against the physical nature of conscious experience.

Katalin Balog, Rutgers University

Katalin Balog received her BA in economics at the Karl Marx University in Budapest. After some years of working as an economist, she moved to the United States to study philosophy. She got her PhD at Rutgers University, New Brunswick in 1998. She taught philosophy at Cornell University, and then Yale University between 1998 and 2010. In 2010 she moved to Rutgers University/Newark where she is still teaching. Her primary areas of research are the philosophy of mind and metaphysics. The problems that interest her most are the nature of the mind, consciousness and the self. Her recent work centers on the relationship between our subjective, internal understanding of the mind and the objective, scientific view of the world.


Nonlocal Reasoning: Philosophy and Science across Cultures

Quantum Non-locality and Emptiness are among the deepest explorations of reality in their respective intellectual traditions. Both, in their own way, are empirical discoveries (or at least claimed to be so); Nonlocality in the Lab and Emptiness in the depths of contemplation, but both also lend themselves to (endless?) philosophical elaboration as well. While we are mostly discussing the two topics somewhat separately, it’s worth asking whether the conceptual frameworks stand to benefit from talking to each other. Even if such a dialog is attractive in principle, it looks difficult in practice, for the concerns of the two communities are rather different. My goal in this presentation is to ask how (or if) we can go beyond mutual appreciation to a deeper engagement with each others discoveries. As someone who is an expert in neither, I feel entirely qualified for the task.

Rajesh Kasturirangan, National Institute of Advanced Studies

Rajesh Kasturirangan is a scholar, practitioner, teacher and technologist with over ten years of experience in creating scholarly networks, research programs, curricula and online technologies. He has technical and institutional expertise in combining Asian philosophical and contemplative traditions with scientific investigations of the human mind and human wellbeing and in creating digital and physical spaces for learning. He also has organizational expertise in managing distributed groups of activists and scholars in the context of creating networks for social and environmental justice.


The Spiritual Experience of Emptiness

ABSTRACT: Emptiness is among the most profound philosophies in Buddhist practice. It is considered the antidote to selfishness and self-grasping which is the ultimate root cause of suffering. Through a process of analyzing and familiarizing oneself with the philosophy of emptiness, self-grasping and attachment is diminished, and equality between self and other is cultivated. Eventually this practice leads to enlightenment, but even for the novice it can have transformative effects on how they you see themselves and others in the world.

Khangser Rinpoche, Sera Jey Monastery

Khangser Rinpoche was born in 1975 and recognized as the 8th reincarnation of his lineage in 1980. Rinpche obtained his Geshe Lharampa degree in Buddhist Philosophy in 2002. Rinpoche has founded several foundations and organization dedicated to the cultural preservation of Buddhist practice, including the Himalayan Buddhist Heritage Foundation based in Kathamandu, Nepal (in 2007), the Foundation for the Preservation of the Nhien Dang (Atisha) Buddhist Heritage (in 2011), and the Dipankara Buddhist Organization in Taiwan (in 2012). Rinpoche presently serves as a spiritual teacher at Sera Jey Monastic University, where he teaches Buddhist philosophy to several hundred monks. Rinpoche also delivers public teachings on Tibetan Buddhism to diverse audiences from India, Nepal, Vietnam, China, Korea, Tibet and the West.